Former secretary of state refuses to say if successor Tillerson should go, as she decries Trump approach to Iran nuclear deal
Clinton: Brexit vote was precursor to US election defeat
Hillary Clinton has denounced Donald Trump’s bellicose language toward North Korea, believing his verbal aggression has rattled American allies and will set off a nuclear arms race in the region.
‘He is failing’: Donald Trump strikes out solo as friends worry and enemies circle
“We will now have an arms race – a nuclear arms race in East Asia,” Clinton said in an interview with CNN due to be broadcast on Sunday, in which she also criticised Trump’sthreat to pull out of the international nuclear deal with Iran. “We will have the Japanese, who understandably are worried with missiles flying over them as the North Koreans have done, that they can’t count on America.”
Clinton, who was secretary of state under Barack Obama from 2009 to 2013, stressed that she preferred a diplomatic solution; suggested Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric played into Kim Jong-un’s hands; and bemoaned Trump’s public undercutting of his secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, regarding his attempts to work with China and establish talks with Pyongyang.
“Diplomacy, preventing war, creating some deterrents is slow, hard-going, difficult work,” said Clinton, who declined to answer when asked if Tillerson should resign. “And you can’t have impulsive people or ideological people who basically say, ‘Well, we’re done with you.”’
On Friday Bob Corker, the Tennessee Republican who chairs the Senate foreign relations committee, continued his war of words with the president when he told the Washington Post Trump had “castrated” Tillerson.
“The greatest diplomatic activities we have are with China, and the most important, and they have come a long, long way,” Corker added. “Some of the things we are talking about are phenomenal. When you jack the legs out from under your chief diplomat, you cause all that to fall apart.”
Clinton recently released a book that recounts her 2016 election defeat by Trump – in which she won nearly 3m more ballots but lost in the electoral college. The White House did not immediately return a request to respond to her comments.
Clinton said Trump’s threat to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal was “dangerous” and was undermining the validity of US promises to other nations. On Friday, Trump accused Iran of violating the landmark 2015 accord, blaming Tehran for a litany of sinister behavior and hitting its main military wing, the Revolutionary Guard, with anti-terror penalties.
Trump did however break his own campaign pledge to rip up the Iranagreement, deciding not to pull the US out or re-impose nuclear sanctions, though he left that option on the table.
Analysis/ Trump risks making US rogue actor as he condemns Iran nuclear deal
In the interview, which was recorded on Wednesday, Clinton said Trump’s insistence on decertifying the deal even though evidence has pointed to Iranian compliance “makes us look foolish and small and plays right into Iranian hands”.
“That is bad not just on the merits for this particular situation, but it sends a message across the globe that America’s word is not good,” she said. “We have different presidents, and this particular president is, I think, upending the kind of trust and credibility of the United States’ position and negotiation that is imperative to maintain.”
Clinton, who as secretary of state began negotiations on the deal, did say Iran was engaging in other dangerous behavior.
For now, Trump is throwing the issue to Congress and other nations, telling lawmakers to toughen the law that governs US participation and calling on the other parties to fix issues including the scheduled expiration of key restrictions under “sunset provisions” that begin in 2025 and the omission of provisions on ballistic missile testing and terrorism.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.